As the Michael Flynn case appears to be winding down, many are demanding answers about how it ever got started.

Some have said the Obama administration targeted Flynn, in an attempt to take down incoming President Trump.

Now, a new court document might put Biden in hot water, as lawyers alleged, he was very much involved:

Former Vice President Joe Biden appears to have “personally raised the idea” of investigating Michael Flynn for potentially having violated the obscure Logan Act during his phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, according to newly filed court papers Wednesday…

 

”That became an admitted pretext to investigate General Flynn.”

This development is extremely important for the investigation and the 2020 race.

We have reported on how Joe Biden openly denied having any knowledge of the case against Flynn when he was vice president. Then, he backtracked (during the same interview) to admit he did know about the investigation.

Except, he claimed, he wasn’t personally involved.

This new document raises new questions about Biden’s narrative. If the defense lawyers’ assertions are true, Biden wasn’t only personally involved, but he might have been a part of kicking it off.

It also seems to highlight Obama’s involvement and FBI Director Comey’s admission that the Flynn/Kislyak call was not problematic.

The FBI went after Flynn over the relatively obscure “Logan Act.” The media spread the story that Flynn broke the law by not disclosing his interaction with Russia during his interview.

Recently, the DOJ dropped the charges against him, saying there was no material reason for him to be investigated in the first place.

Court documents seem to suggest that the idea to charge Flynn with violations of the Logan Act may have come from Joe Biden.

That probably will not be good news for Biden’s 2020 campaign. As he tries to win over the American public, he might have to explain his involvement in the Flynn debacle.

• New court documents accuse Biden of suggesting the Logan Act used against Michael Flynn.
• Biden had previously denied being personally connected to the case against Flynn.
• If true, this accusation contradicts Biden’s story, raising questions about his role in the situation.

Source: New York Post

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez seems to be a darling of the far-left. But her chances at re-election aren’t as solid as she thinks.

Her two years in Congress haven’t been stellar. She even cost New York a big deal with Amazon.

And now, her own progressives might be turning on her. Because a judge just removed her from a ballot.

From Fox News:

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., was booted from the progressive union-backed Working Families Party (WFP) ballot line by a Queens judge…

The freshman lawmaker was removed from the primary ballot after receiving only 13 signatures from members of the progressive group.

Wow. A judge removed AOC’s name from the Working Families Party ballot line for lacking to receive enough signatures.

AOC is running against a hot new Democratic rival. Every vote counts. If her name appeared more than once on the ballot (both under Democrat and WFP) she could count all those votes.

But she couldn’t even get 15 progressives to sign her petition. This is a party that backs unions. What does that tell you?

AOC made big promises to win her seat. What has she done in return? Well, she “cried” at the border, I remember that.

She recently told Americans not to go back to work after lockdowns. Um… anything else?

Oh, she cost New York billions by killing an Amazon deal. And she proposed the Green New Deal.

Yeah, not a great rap sheet.

Now, she faces a popular, moderate rival who just might take her nomination. Wouldn’t that be something!?

SHARE if you want AOC to lose her primary.

Source: Fox News

A former assistant director of intelligence for the FBI is shaking up the Crossfire Hurricane case.

He is saying the document that started the investigation—which has just been released—is a bombshell.

Nobody is giving it attention. But it reveals that the case against Trump and his campaign, started by Strzok, may have been a fraud from the beginning.

From The Hill:

The prosecutor, U.S. Attorney John Durham, will rightly point out that the document that spawned three years of political misery fails to articulate a single justifiable reason for starting the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation…

What this FBI document clearly establishes is that Crossfire Hurricane was an illicit, made-up investigation lacking a shred of justifying predication, sprung from the mind of someone who despised Donald Trump.

The newly released document reveals two key things that cast the entire case into doubt.

Brock reveals the document was authored by Peter Strzok, addressed to Strzok, and sent to Strzok. That is not normal in the least. He calls the document “an absurdity” and it violates FBI protocols.

But it gets worse from there.

In order to open an investigation of this nature, you have to list a criminal violation. Instead, this document demands an investigation of Trump over a “suggestion of a suggestion.” No clear crimes are mentioned.

Our Take:

James Comey and his FBI cronies should be sweating.

It appears the very start of CF was rooted in Strzok’s (and others’) desire to stop Trump from winning the election.

He crafted an odd document, demanding an investigation, but did not list any crimes to justify it. There was a rumor of rumors that Russia was trying to interfere with the election.

But even less than a rumor that Trump’s campaign was involved. In fact, they admit it was “unclear” how the Trump campaign would even react to Russia’s intentions.

Strzok undermines his own case but forges ahead anyway. This led to the wiretapping of Carter Page’s emails and the large probe against Trump and his campaign.

And 3+ years of the left calling Trump a “Russian puppet.”

This document reveals it was illegitimate from the start. Most likely a scheme by FBI agents who wanted Hillary Clinton to win.

And were willing to go to great lengths to make it happen.

Now that we know this, will a single Democrat admit they were wrong? I won’t hold my breath waiting.

SHARE to make sure no one misses this bombshell evidence.

Source: The Hill

In a terrifying new development, at least for the residents of the state of New York, it is now a felony for a DMV employee to share information with ICE, DHS and other federal immigration enforcement agencies.

Via BizPacReview:

A U.S. Attorney in New York accused Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo of “legislating obstruction” with a law that bans police from sharing Department of Motor Vehicles information with federal immigration agencies. New York’s Green Light Law was passed last year allowing a driver’s license to anyone without legal immigration status, and now the approved 2020 budget has added an eyebrow-raising amendment.

While the Green Light Law prohibited the sharing of DMV information with the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Cuomo’s 2020 budget passed last month as all eyes were on the coronavirus crisis, now makes that sharing of information by any law enforcement officer a class E Felony, according to WKBW.

“Border Patrol for example, working the highway in the middle of the night and pulls over a vehicle, they can’t run the plates to determine who owns that vehicle,” U.S. Attorney for the Western District of New York J.P. Kennedy told WKBW.

“I think it’s legislating obstruction and it’s very concerning to me,” Kennedy added.

Watch the local news report, via WKBW:

This can only be called insane, and is certain to cost lives and destroy others. In fact New York’s immigration policies and refusal to cooperate with immigration enforcement agencies is causing huge problems in the state.

Reeaz Khan, an illegal Guyanese immigrant, is accused of sexually assaulting and murdering Fuertes last month. Fuertes was reportedly found at 2 a.m. near death, before being taken to a hospital where she died from injuries including a broken spine. He has pleaded not guilty.

But the case has cast a spotlight on the dangers of “sanctuary” jurisdictions, which forbid local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities when they issue a detainer — a request that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) be alerted of an illegal immigrant’s release from custody so they can be transferred into ICE custody and go through deportation procedures.

ICE revealed it had filed a detainer for Khan in November 2019, when he had been arrested on assault and weapons charges. But crucially, that detainer was ignored and Khan was released onto the streets.

This is but a single example of how New York’s immigration policies are causing an increase in crime in that state.

Seems like Democrats care much more about criminals than they do about the rights and protection of ordinary law abiding citizens.

Time for American citizens to wake up, and put a stop to the Democrats reign of terror come November.

More information on this topic:

De Blasio ignoring ICE pleas for cooperation on illegal immigrant criminals, official says

Murders in NYC surge for second week in a row as coronavirus lockdown continues

ICE Catches Illegal Alien Accused Of Child Rape After NYC Authorities Released Him From Custody

It appears that House Democrats are using the virus to “investigate” Donald Trump, yet again.

Long before anyone else showed concern, President Trump took action to slow the spread of the virus. Apparently, after doing nothing herself, Pelosi claims this wasn’t good enough.

Now, a Republican congressman is calling out Pelosi for neglecting investigations that appear to be far more important.

From Breitbart:

“We should have an investigative body looking at these grants, but Nancy Pelosi is not going to do that,” Reschenthaler said…

What is perhaps most interesting about all this is how little the Democrats on Capitol Hill seem to care about the origins of the virus in Wuhan, China… instead, intend to focus their efforts on attacking President Trump over the Chinese coronavirus.

Rep. Reschenthaler called out Pelosi and House Democrats for refusing to investigate China’s role in the outbreak.

He says that instead of looking into grants that sent tax dollars to Wuhan, Pelosi is trying to use this situation to hit the president.

It wasn’t that long ago that Pelosi spent months and millions of dollars to investigate Trump over a phone call. That resulted in an impeachment that was overturned by the Senate.

Now, instead of focusing on helping Americans, Pelosi and her party are at it again. It appears they accusing Trump of not acting fast enough, early on.

This, despite the fact that as late as February, Pelosi was encouraging Americans to travel to Chinatown, SF.

Reschenthaler assured Americans that Republicans in the House will be moving forward to investigate China. We also know that the White House and State Department have been diligent in getting to the bottom of this virus’ origins.

You’d think the entire country would be united in ending the threat of the disease and discovering China’s role in all this.

But Pelosi has yet to back any investigation or effort to hold China accountable.

The only thing she and the Democrats have done is prepare an investigation into our own President, who has been working tirelessly but accused of trying to profit off this crisis.

What’s more important to you: investigating China’s role in COVID-19’s spread, or using American tax dollars on yet another investigation against our president?

What do you think will end up helping Americans more: an attack on Trump or an effort to get China to repay our losses?

SHARE to tell Pelosi to investigate the pandemic origin immediately.

Source: Breitbart

Nancy Pelosi kept the House closed as her party developed a massive spending bill.

The $3 trillion package is supposed to battle the virus. But it includes a liberal wish list, including blue state bailouts and tax cuts for rich liberals.

And now, here is another little nugget Nance slipped into it…

From Live Action:

While the bill contains the Paycheck Protection Program, it removes safeguards preventing abortion facilities from applying to receive funds. The aid local and state governments receive from the federal government can be used to aid abortion facilities.

Wow. Pelosi’s “HEROES” bill will extend the Paycheck Protect Program, but it removes a rule that prevented Planned Parenthood from getting money.

Which means a chunk of this $3 trillion package could go to this group, and groups like it, that are despised by the conservative right.

Keep in mind, Planned Parenthood already gets a large amount of funding from the federal government.

Not to mention funding from state and local government AND private donations from liberals.

So, do they really need to take money from a program meant to save businesses struggling with lockdowns?

What does PP do that has any connection with COVID relief? Shouldn’t this money go to healthcare workers on the front lines?

The silver lining in all this is that this bill has little chance of passing in the Senate. And the White House has already promised to veto it if hell freezes over and it makes it to Trump’s desk.

But this bill is a perfect picture of Nancy’s—and the rest of the Democrats’—priorities.

While America battles to save the economy, she’s throwing money to Planned Parenthood.

SHARE if you stand against Nancy Pelosi’s far-left bill.

Source: Live Action

Ukrainian parliament member Andrii Derkach just released audio recordings purportedly of Joe Biden and former Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko discussing getting rid of the pesky prosecutor.

Poroshenko:  (7:10 mark) I have some good news…  Yesterday I went and seat with the general prosecutor’s office.

Joe Biden: Yes.

Poroshenko: I especially asked him to resign… as his position as a state prosecutor… He promised to give me statement of his presentation. One hour he gave me statement of his presentation.

Joe Biden: Great.

Joe Biden: (10:20 mark) I am prepared to a public signing for a commitment for a billion dollars.  Again I am not suggesting you want it or don’t want it.  I am suggesting that is what I am prepared to do.  Again it won’t be finalized… Let me when you and I finished speaking let me huddle with my team… I agree with you there is a sense of urgency here.

Joe Biden — (14:30 minute mark from November 2016 call) Congratulations in getting the new Prosecutor General. I know there’s a lot more to that. I really think that’s good. It is going to be critical that he works to repair the damage of Shokin. I’m a man of my word. Now that the new prosecutor general is in place we’re ready to move forward to signing the one billion dollar loan guarantee. And I don’t know how you want to go about that…  I’ll leave it to you to how you want it done and where you want it done.

Here is the section where Joe Biden starts talking and Joe Biden mentions Donald Trump!

From the audio — Joe Biden tells Poroshenko: We will help you get the vote… Let me ask you one thing before I forget, Privatbank… This is getting very, very close. What I don’t want to have happen. I don’t want Trump to get into *** where he thinks he’s about to buy into a situation… where it is about to collapse where he is going to pour more money into Ukraine… So anything you can do to push the Privatbank to closure so that the IMF loan comes forward I stress this is critical to your economic and national security.

Audio is here - Part 1: pic.twitter.com/0hLnPzPaFl

— Verdad Teller 🛡♦ (@Truthteller1349) May 19, 2020

New evidence has emerged that appears to clear Flynn. Now, the president is going after Obama and the men behind Flynn’s setup.

He is demanding something no president ever has: an investigation into his predecessor.

He made it plain and clear in a message on Twitter.

From Twitter:

If I were a Senator or Congressman, the first person I would call to testify about the biggest political crime and scandal in the history of the USA, by FAR, is former President Obama. He knew EVERYTHING. Do it @LindseyGrahamSC, just do it. No more Mr. Nice Guy. No more talk!

President Trump called out members of Congress to call President Obama in for testimony. He called the Flynn case (and possibly the related Mueller probe) the “biggest political crime and scandal” in our history.

He called out Sen. Lindsey Graham, who recently said he wouldn’t question Obama. Trump told Graham to no longer be “Mr. Nice Guy” and call him in.

Don’t let the Democrat’s fool you states are already getting a “bailout” and they DO NOT need any more. No thanks to blue state governors deciding to extend their stay at home orders the US taxpayer is now floating unemployment benefits.

Not knowing how serious the coronavirus pandemic would be the Trump administration set up a program to help states deal with their unemployment claims when and if they run out of money. After all unemployment benefits have no money to draw from if nobody is working.

California has become the first state to borrow from the federal government so they can continue to afford unemployment benefits. Newsom has borrowed $348 million in taxpayer money and will be allowed to withdraw up to $10 billion through the end of July.

But that’s not all, we are now going to be on the hook for other liberal governors wishing to extend their stay at home orders, Market Watch reports:

The U.S. government has also approved loans of up to $12.6 billion for Illinois and up to $1.1 billion for Connecticut through the end of July to replenish state unemployment insurance funds, though the two states hadn’t yet started borrowing by the end of April. California was the only state to have accessed the program so far in the current downturn, the Treasury spokesman said.

Democrats are demanding that in the next relief package the federal government bailout state and local governments. But, the truth is we are already bailing them out by covering their unemployment benefits.

The governor of Illinois just extended his stay at home order until June 6th, while his wife sits lavishly at her mansion in South Florida, and the US taxpayer will float his state $12.6 billion. That’s more than what California is getting and they are a smaller state!

This must stop if liberal governors can’t afford unemployment to start opening up your economy.

It’s nice that the Trump administration put a program together to help states make sure Americans don’t starve but, NO MORE BAILOUTS!!

Market Watch

Going swimming anyway? Do it with these patriotic swim shorts! #Trump2020 FREE SHIPPING!!https://t.co/01aqJkn96I pic.twitter.com/Sdvsmvml3n

— Conservative Collections (@ConserveCollect) May 5, 2020

The Deep State is now going after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and are trying to force him to resign.

A federal Obama appointed judge has issued an order demanding an investigation into Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY). A federal judge in collusion with liberal activists is trying to stonewall the nomination of conservative judge Justin Walker. The liberal group “Demand Justice” requested that Walker’s confirmation be postponed because they claim McConnell pressured the older federal judge to retire so Walker could take his place.

“The hearing on Walker’s nomination should not go forward until we know the truth about what ethical lines Mitch McConnell crossed to get Walker this seat,” Demand Justice said in a statement. “McConnell should come clean about whether and when he contacted Judge Thomas Griffith prior to his sudden retirement.” 

Right on cue, Obama appointed federal judge Sri Srinivasan, chief justice of the court where Walker will work issued an order demanding the US Supreme Court and Chief Justice John Roberts investigate.

The New York Times has also joined in, The Hill reports:

The New York Times has reported that McConnell has allegedly pressured judges to retire in time for President Trump to fill their vacancies this term. A spokesperson for McConnell’s office told The Hill that the senator, “looks forward to watching Judge Walker’s confirmation hearing this week.”

 This looks like Roger Stone collusion all over again. What Democrats are really worried about is that a 38-year-old conservative judge is about to take a position on the DC circuit court of appeals, a court that outside of the 9th circuit is the most liberal. Since taking office McConnell and President Trump have worked hard filling the courts with conservative judges. They have done such a great job that liberals have complained the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is no longer liberal after a couple more positions are filled the court may even be conservative.

The Hill

Going swimming anyway? Do it with these patriotic swim shorts! #Trump2020 FREE SHIPPING!!https://t.co/01aqJkn96I pic.twitter.com/Sdvsmvml3n

— Conservative Collections (@ConserveCollect) May 5, 2020

Don Lemon went after President Trump with an extended rant on his television program and went low and even tried to attack Melania Trump.

Sadly for Don he missed badly and ended up embarrassing Michelle Obama instead. Look, first ladies have different styles and one could argue their most important job is to try to raise their kids to be normal in that fishbowl.

By all accounts, Michelle and Melania have done well at this important job but is it really fair to Michelle to compare her looks to a former model like Melania Trump?

Lemon blasted Trump and said he was fixated on Barack Obama before attacking Melania and saying, or seeming to say, that Michelle was better looking than the former model.

It is a contest Michelle, or for that matter anyone who is not or was not a model, can’t win so who knows what Lemon was trying to do but all he ended up doing was hurting Michelle.

“What is it about President Obama that really gets under your skin?” Lemon said to Trump on his show over the weekend.

“Is it because he’s smarter than you?”

“Better educated? Made it on his own—didn’t need Daddy’s help?”

“Wife is more accomplished? Better looking?”

“I don’t know, what is it, what is it about him?”

“That he’s a black man that’s accomplished being president?”

“That he punked you on the whole birth certificate thing?”

“What is it about him? Just wondering.”

Don Lemon decided to blast First Lady Melania’s looks and accomplishments on CNN pic.twitter.com/bVh55qkQnX

— Jack Po-So-Bik (@JackPosobiec) May 4, 2020

This is @CNN’s Don Lemon. Watch this and try to tell me he’s objective. He’s not. He’s also incredibly disrespectful to our First Lady in the clip.

This is CNN. The fakest name in news. pic.twitter.com/5UlTEDRsfn

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) May 4, 2020

Katie Hill the former U.S. congresswoman from California and current “throuple” enthusiast accidentally praised George W. Bush for this inspiring video he put out about Americans coming together to combat the coronavirus:

In a million years I never thought I’d be crying watching this, thinking how much better we’d all feel if Bush were president today. Wtf. https://t.co/SSR3ieZEFP

— Katie Hill (@KatieHill4CA) May 2, 2020

 Oh boy. This was a similar sentiment from many liberals and others about the yuge chasm between dubya’s tone and Trump’s tone. Well, that didn’t done sit too right with Hill’s liberal base of support:

In a million years I never thought I’d be crying watching this, thinking how much better we’d all feel if Bush were president today. Wtf. https://t.co/SSR3ieZEFP

— Katie Hill (@KatieHill4CA) May 2, 2020

 That was just 30 minutes later! LOL! But it didn’t stop there, she had to apologize or risk losing her precious precious far left progressive followers:

To people who are mad about this tweet... are you really saying that you wouldn’t feel better if Bush were in the office instead of Trump?

We’re talking about relativity here. Not that I think for one second Bush was a good president. That’s... the point.

— Katie Hill (@KatieHill4CA) May 2, 2020

 So much for reaching across the aisle. Ironically, Hill was one of the few Democrats who actually tried to reach bipartisan solutions when she was in Congress. That’s before she got caught diddling her underlings.

I apologize that this seemed dismissive of the horrors of the Bush years - in which I was an LGBT teenage girl who knew many people who served (and died) in the wars that are still not over. Maybe it’s true that in the end, his “legacy” will still be worse that Trump’s.

— Katie Hill (@KatieHill4CA) May 2, 2020

 Twitter is a strict mistress. Even if you’re used to “throupling.”